Preferred Pieces of paper and Critic Prizes
Per year, the Editorial staff members chooses the documents from that twelve months which may have constructed the most significant effects on the hypothesis or train of associated risk investigation. Employees also selects testers that have already offered outstanding testimonials to acknowledge their astounding campaigns and contributions into the journal.this page The accreditation are given from the SRA’s Twelve-monthly Business meeting.
2015 Top Papers “Operational Designs of Structure Durability,” by David L. Alderson, Gerald G. Brown and W. Matthew Carlyle, 35(4):562-586. “The method of Antifragility and its particular Significance for practicing Risk Analysis,” by Terje Aven, 35(3):476-483. “Cognitive and Motivational Biases in Final decision and Threat Exploration,” by Gilberto Montibeller and Detlof von Winterfeldt, 35(7):1230-1251. “The Connection between City Kind on Ambient Oxygen Pollution and General population Health Risk: A Case Review in Raleigh, North Carolina” by Theodore J. Mansfield, Daniel A. Rodriguez, Joseph Huegy and Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson, 35(5):901-918 2014 Best Written documents Influence of Bought Immunity and Dose-Based Possibility of Disease on Quantitative Microbial Threat Examination Arie H. Havelaar and Arno Swart 34(10): 1807-1819 Uncertainty in Climate Change Modelling: Can Global Awareness Exploration Be Of Enable? Barry Anderson, Emanuele Borgonovo, Marzio Galeotti, Roberto Roson 34(2):271-293 Attenuating Earliest Attitudes: Improving the Approval of Anthropogenic Climate Change Information by Reflecting On Values Anne-Marie van Prooijen and Paul Sets off 34(5):929-936 Managing the Fukushima Concern Atsuyuki Suzuki 34(7):1240-1256 2013 Greatest Papers
The unintended effects of potential risk-refuting info on panic 33(1): 80-91 – Kazuya Nakayachi Wildfire coverage study about the federal jungles while in the Pacific North west, America 33(6): 1000-1020 – Alan Ager, Michelle Buonopane, Allison Reger and Signature A. Finney Reduced-likelihood deluge threat modeling for The Big Apple 33(5): 772-788 – Jeroen C.J.H. Aerts, Ning Lin, Wouter Botzen, Kerry Emanual and Hans de Moel 2012 Most effective Newspapers An assessment of Potential risk Perceptions and also other Variables that Have an effect on Deluge Mitigation Actions . 32(9):1481-1495-Philip Bubeck, Willem Jan Wouter Botzen, Jeroen Aerts Modeling Reasonable Adversaries for Terrorism Chance Examination: Some Essential Illnesses for Adversary Products . 32(7):1117-1121-Seth Guikema Adversarial Threat Exploration for Counterterrorism Modeling . 32(5):894-915-Jesus M. Rios Aliaga Visiting Robust Alternatives for Local climate Adaptation in Woodland Property Managing . 32(12):2098-2112-Tim McDaniels, Tamsin Mills, Robin Gregory, Dan Ohlson Adversarial Potential risk Research with Incomplete Advice: A Point-k Solution . 32(7):1219-1231-Casey Rothschild, Laura McLay, Seth Guikema To the Potential risk Organization and Hazard Governance for Petrol Operations within the Barents Sea Space, 32(9):1561-1575–Terje Aven and Ortwin Renn 2011 Top Reports A Causal Style of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases (COPD) Risk Tony Cox, 31(1):38-62. Proper Appraisal of Environmental Hazards: A Compare between UK’s Stern Assessment in the Economics of Climate Change and the Committee on Radioactive Waste Administration Simon Dietz and Alec Morton, 31(1):129-142.
Why Near Forget Gatherings Can Decline an Individual’s Defending Reaction to Severe weather Robin Dillon, Catherine Tinsley, and Matthew Cronin, 31(3):440-449. Environmental Probability Evaluation, Prediction and Examining Threat Estimates Label Gibbs, 31(11). The White (Masculine) Consequence and Risk Notion: Can Equality Really make a difference? Anna Olofsson and Saman Rashid, 31(6):1016-1032. Can Environment Insurance Triumph Precisely where Other Practices Crash? The Scenario of Below the ground Storage containers Tanks Haitao Yin, Alex Pfaff, and Howard Kunreuther, 31(1):12-24. 2010 Greatest Paperwork Assessing Evacuation vs .. Shelter-in-Location Ideas After having a Terrorist Nuclear Detonation Lawrence Wein and Youngsoo Choi, 30(9):1315-1327. Handling Invasive Varieties in the actual existence of Endogenous Technological Adjust with Uncertainty C.S. Kim, Glenn D. Schaible, Jan Lewandrowski, and Utpal Vasavada, 30(2):250-260. Prioritizing The environmental Health Conditions inside UAE Henry Willis, Jacqueline MacDonald, Regina Shih, Sandra Geschwind, Sarah Olmstead, Jianhui Hu, Aimee Curtright, Gary Cecchine, and Melinda Moore, 30(12). The User-friendly Finding Theorist (IDT) Style of Have faith in in Hazard Leadership Matthew P. White colored and Branden B. Johnson, 30 (8):1196-1209. Risk Governance for Mobil Smartphones, Electric power Queues, and also other EMF Technological innovation Leeka Kheifets, John Swanson, Shaiela Kandel, and Timothy Malloy, 30(10):1482-1494.
Anthropic Shadow: Observation Variety Side effects and Human Extinction Threats Milan Cirkovic, Anders Sandbert, and Nick Bostrom, 30(10):1495-1506. Share to Ideal Situation-Affiliated Old fashioned paper Set – 2010 Terrorism Associated risk Educated Adversary Associated risk Assessment: A Bioterrorism Financial risk Control System Gregory S. Parnell, Christopher M. Smith, and Frederick I. Moxley, 30(1):32-48. Probabilistic Threat Study and Terrorism Danger Barry Ezell, Steve Bennett, Detlof von Winterfeldt, John Sokolowski, and Andrew Collins, 30(4) 575-589. A reaction to Parnell, Smith, and Moxley, Sensible Adversary Chance Analysis: A Bioterrorism Risk Relief Product Barry C. Ezell and Andrew J. Collins, 30(6):875. Reply to Note towards the Editor Gregory S. Parnell and Christopher M. Smith, 30(6):876. Anxiety Reasons Conundrums with Anxiety Points Roger Cooke, 30(3):330-339. Are Conundrums with Skepticism Variables a hurdle to Getting Probabilistic Interpretations of Noncancer Dangers for Substances? Deprive Goble and Dale Hattis, 30(3):340-345. Discourse of “Conundrums with Uncertainty Factors” Thomas Louis, 30(3):346-348. Anxiety Issue Conundrums: What Coaching Really should We Pull? Lorenz R. Rhomberg, 30(3):349-352. Reaction to Reviewers Roger M. Cooke, 30(3):353. Have confidence in and Hazard Believe in in Threat Organization: A Model-Established Article on Empirical Exploration Timothy Earle, 30(4):541-574. Trust: The Difficulties in Unique the two main Concepts in Examine Michael Siegrist, 30(7):1022-1024. Distinguishing Believe in from Faith: Feasible Challenges, Worthy of Energy Timothy Earle, 30(7):1025-1027.
2009 Preferred Papers Assessing Critical Doubt Thresholds in a very Spatial Style of Woodland Pest Intrusion Potential risk Frank Koch, Denys Yemshanov, Daniel McKenney, and William Smith, 29(9). One of Exposure to Rotavirus from No-nutritionary Ingestion Iterated by Simulated Occasional Contact lenses Timothy Julian, Robert Canales, David Leckie and Alexandria Boehm, 29(5). Decrease in Personal life As a result of the Surging of the latest Orleans following Hurricane Katrina: A Preliminary Analysis of the Romantic relationship amongst Deluge Elements and Fatality Sebastiaan Jonkman, Bob Maaskant, Ezra Boyd, and Marc Lloyd Levitan, 29(5). Supervising Social and Institutional Concerns in Toddler Coverage Eileen Munro, 29(7). Combating the Whitened Loss: Avalanche Chance Administration for Site traffic Paths Christoph Rheinberger, Michael Brundl, and Jakob Rhyner, 29(1). 2015 Perfect Reviewers Roger Flage Robin Dillon-Merrill Thekdi, Shital Robyn Wilson Michael R. Greenberg (Guide Reviewer) 2014 Ideal Testers John Besley Robert Budnitz Warner To the north (Guide Critic) 2013 Perfect Reviewers Terje Aven Carmen Keller Emanuele Borgonovo 2012 Greatest Reviewers Craig Trumbo Don Schaffner James Hammitt Jim Lambert Mitchell Small-scale 2011 Best Reviewers Roger Cooke Seth Guikema 2010 Best Reviewers L. Robin Keller Timothy Earle Keith Florig